7: The Number That Demanded Our Attention and How We Can Fix The Classification System

7.

It’s the unspoken elephant in the room, and the adjective that is quick to warrant an opinion in South Dakota.

Don’t believe me?

Let’s talk 7 classes. Or 7 straight championships from Pierre.

There we go, that’s the reaction we were looking for.

But the truth is, under all that dislike of the number 7, there is some deep American roots growing…

Competitiveness.

In American sports, we love competitiveness (sorry F1 and Premier League fans). And when we look at the state of SD football, we see a lack of competitiveness.

But what if I told you today, that there is a system that gives you the competitiveness you want, and still allows a lot of teams to get into the playoffs.

Let’s make a quick trip south and see if we can find the answer.


First, we need to understand why there is 7 classes in the first place. And the answer to that question is distribution.

South Dakota has a small population (duh) which means fewer schools in a similar range of school sizes all the other states. Think about it for a moment, what state doesn’t have schools that have a 1,000 kids and schools that have 30?

That one isn’t hard to figure out.

The problem then is South Dakota has the same school size distribution but with less schools. That makes for less teams across the board.

However, competitiveness in football does not necessarily depend on the number of teams, but the amount of athletes.

And while you may disagree, you can ask yourself this…who would win more games, Central in 11B or Hot Springs in 11AAA? (Also, no disrespect to the Bison. They are a great team.)

Now, there is obvious variation of talent within these levels. In bigger states, that is no problem. In a smaller state, however, that means the number of teams who can win championships is limited in an already small class.

But even if the system we currently have does make sense when considering the circumstances, public resentment is forcing a change.

This change, however, doesn’t have to be big. Small tweaks are what is going to fix this, not massive reclassification.

So may I present a system with 6 classes. These classes keep teams within a competitive enrollment distribution, without the knee-jerk reaction of eliminating and combining classes like a freaky science project.

And where can these mysterious classifications be found?

Right in our backyard.


When looking at various state systems, I realized Nebraska’s was by far the most useful and connected to South Dakota’s. They have a similar class structure to what we already have, but they have larger class sizes and ranges. That’s just what we are looking for.

So I went ahead and looked at where each SD school would be in this system, and it’s….perfect?

I mean seriously this is the best we will get. It’s competitive, it’s structured well, and it absolutely works.

Here are rules:

  1. We are looking at Boys Enrollment for grades 9-11.
  2. Enrollment is combined for the programs listed that are in a co-op.
  3. Classes look like this:
    • A = 11AAA
    • B = 11AA
    • C1 = 11A
    • C2 = 11B
    • D1 = 9AA
    • D2 = 9A
    • D6 = 9B
  4. This is experimental and the numbers/classes in this article are not final.

All other rules will be explained. Let’s start with Class A.


SchoolEnrollmentClass
Sioux Falls Washington768A
Rapid City Central765A
Sioux Falls Lincoln733A
Sioux Falls Jefferson712A
Rapid City Stevens688A
Sioux Falls Roosevelt670A
Harrisburg583A
Brandon Valley527A
Aberdeen Central513A
Watertown479A
O’Gorman273A

For this class, I did every school that would be in Nebraska’s Class A.

As you’ll see later on, the addition of bringing teams into higher classes is going to solve some of that competitiveness problem.

You want Central to play some other teams that aren’t from the Sioux Falls area? There you go.

This system allows the Cobblers to have winnable games, while still playing the AAA powerhouses.

And I think it’s good for Watertown and Aberdeen too. In no other state would they not be playing these teams. Good work from the system, now let’s move to Class B.


SchoolEnrollmentClass
Sturgis Brown373B
Yankton369B
Mitchell367B
Brookings360B
Huron339B
Douglas332B
Pierre T.F. Riggs324B
Spearfish303B
Tea Area246B
Lakota Tech211B
Belle Fourche180B
West Central177B
Dakota Valley167B

Again, increased competition all around. You get some really strong additions to the top and enough teams that making the playoffs are actually a challenge.

Note: This would be every team that would play in Nebraska’s Class B.


For Class C1 & C2, the state takes every remaining 11-man team and divides them in two. C1 would essentially be the bottom of 11A and the top of 11B. That’s 28 schools, including Hamlin.

SchoolEnrollmentClass
Sioux Falls Christian151C1
Vermillion150C1
Lennox149C1
Sisseton136C1
Madison134C1
Dell Rapids130C1
Milbank127C1
Canton127C1
Chamberlain113C1
Pine Ridge112C1
Custer111C1
Beresford111C1
Tri-Valley107C1
Hamlin103C1
Flandreau97C1
Rapid City Christian91C1
Lead-Deadwood90C1
Elk Point-Jefferson90C1
Aberdeen Roncalli89C1
Hot Springs88C1
Winner83C1
Dakota Hills81C1
T-D/A/AC/DC80C1
Mobridge-Pollock79C1
M/H-H79C1
B/E-E77C1
MC/M76C1
Wagner75C1

I know the Chargers have some exemption, but no changes in this round. We need to see the field before any adjustments.

But wait there is only like 35 teams in the bottom of 11A and all of 11B. Where are the rest of the C2 teams from?

Well my friends, we have too many 9-man teams.

In this system, the bigger schools in 9AA can field competitive 11-man teams. They would be going up against schools very much their size, and the state agrees. Any team over 48 countable male students (9-11) would be in C2.

And again, the system looks terrific.

SchoolEnrollmentClass
Baltic74C2
W/WS/SC74C2
Redfield72C2
Groton Area71C2
Sioux Valley70C2
Hill City69C2
Deuel69C2
MV/P68C2
F/M/FA67C2
St. Thomas More65C2
Parker64C2
Scotland/Menno64C2
Florence/Henry63C2
Estelline/Hendricks63C2
C/WL63C2
Webster Area61C2
K/WL56C2
Garretson55C2
Parkston54C2
Bon Homme54C2
Lemmon/McIntosh54C2
Elkton-Lake Benton52C2
Dupree52C2
White River50C2
Howard49C2
Bennett County49C2
Viborg-Hurley48C2
L/FA48C2

Finally, we get to the 9-man schools. D1 and D2 is again split evenly. Again, I have no notes. It’s just beautiful.

SchoolEnrollmentClass
Ipswich47D1
Stanley County46D1
Britton-Hecla46D1
Wall45D1
Platte-Geddes45D1
Great Plains Lutheran44D1
Hanson43D1
Timber Lake42D1
Gregory42D1
Chester42D1
Harding County42D1
Wolsey-Wessington41D1
Colman-Egan41D1
Waverly-South Shore40D1
Northwestern40D1
Lyman39D1
Philip38D1
Deubrook Area38D1
Hitchcock-Tulare38D1
Centerville37D1
SchoolEnrollmentClass
Iroquois/Lake Preston37D2
Warner37D2
Newell36D2
Oldham-Ramona-Rutland35D2
Castlewood35D2
Canistota35D2
Burke35D2
Alcester-Hudson35D2
New Underwood34D2
H/SA34D2
Irene-Wakonda33D2
Gayville-Volin32D2
De Smet32D2
Potter County32D2
Kadoka Area31D2
Faulkton Area31D2
Faith31D2
Arlington31D2
Sully Buttes30D2
Avon28D2

Finally, we have something experimental…

6-man.

I’m not sure if South Dakota is ready for it, and honestly the class size is too small. But Nebraska started with about 8 teams, and I could see some co-ops disappearing to make that happen.

If not, these teams move to D2, and the top of D2 gets bumped accordingly.

SchoolEnrollmentClass
Corsica-Stickney22D6
Jones County21D6
Dell Rapids St. Mary21D6
Colome19D6
Sunshine Bible Academy7D6

So there you have it folks.

A system that makes every class more competitive, eliminates a 9-man class, and gives us everything we have been asking for.

Now, let’s make it happen.