Notes:

  1. Rank+ is based off of a teams class. A 100 score is equal to class average.
    • Each point increase or decrease is equal to a 1% increase in scoring margin against class average team.
    • This does NOT mean a 1 point increase equals a 1 point higher projection on the court. This is because a 1% increase in scoring margin varies by class class.
  2. Projections will be posted on game days. Please scroll to see a Region-by-Region breakdown.

CLASS RANKINGS

RANKTEAMRECORDRANK+
1O’Gorman17-4165.7
2Pierre18-3155.3
3Washington18-3154.7
4Jefferson17-4150.3
5Brandon Valley15-6129.3
6Harrisburg16-5125.9
7Stevens14-7125.3
8Watertown12-9111.0
9Spearfish10-10106.0
10Mitchell9-12101.2
11Aberdeen7-12100.6
12Lincoln8-1399.4
13Huron9-1294.3
14Brookings5-1682.4
15RC Central6-1582.2
16Roosevelt1-2053.5
17Yankton2-1842.6
18Sturgis3-1520.4
19Douglas2-180.0

STATE TOURNAMENT PROJECTIONS

RoundGameProjectionResult
Q#1 SFW vs.
#8 Watertown
SFW
(9.91)
SFW
(24)
Q#4 SFJ vs.
#12 Mitchell
SFJ
(13.06)
SFJ
(16)
Q#2 Pierre vs.
#7 Stevens
PIE
(9.45)
PIE
(8)
Q#3 OG vs.
#6 Harrisburg
OG
(12.02)
HAR
(12)
C#8 Watertown
vs. #12 Mitchell
WAT
(3.06)
MIT
(11)
C#3 OG vs.
#7 Stevens
OG
(10.98)
OG
(8)
S#1 SFW vs.
#4 SFJ
SFW
(0.87)
SFW
(3)
S#2 Pierre vs.
#6 Harrisburg
PIE
(8.21)
PIE
(14)
7th#7 Stevens vs.
#8 Watertown
RCS
(4.35)
RCS
(2)
5th#3 OG vs.
#12 Mitchell
OG
(16.95)
OG
(35)
3rd#4 Jefferson vs.
#6 Harrisburg
SFJ
(5.71)
SFJ
(21)
1st#1 Washington
vs. #2 Pierre
PIE
(1.98)
SFW
(18)

SODAK 16 PROJECTIONS

LocationGameProjectionResult
Sioux Falls#1 SFW vs.
#16 SFR
SFW
(29.21)
SFW
(13)
Pierre#2 Pierre vs.
#15 Brookings
PIE
(21.27)
PIE
(26)
Sioux Falls#3 O’Gorman vs.
#14 RC Central
OG
(23.13)
OG
(35)
Sioux Falls#4 SFJ vs.
#13 Aberdeen
SFJ
(13.28)
SFJ
(16)
Brandon#5 BV vs.
#12 Mitchell
BV
(9.01)
MIT
(4)
Harrisburg#6 Harrisburg
vs. #11 Spear.
HAR
(5.52)
HAR
(5)
Rapid City#7 Stevens vs.
#10 Huron
RCS
(8.34)
RCS
(14)
Watertown#8 Watertown
vs. #9 SFL
WAT
(4.75)
WAT
(2)